Skip to content
Joan Advincula

Joan Advincula

Criminology. Technology. Education.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Crim Notes
    • ChFo 102 Character Formation 2
      • Leadership and Management
        • Leadership vs Management
        • Principles of Leadership
        • Theories of Leadership
        • Leadership Styles
        • Management Styles
        • Efficient Management
        • Qualities of Leaders and Managers
      • Administration
        • Principles of Administration
        • Theories of Administration
        • Functions of Administration
        • Police Management
        • Division of Work
        • Authority and Responsibility
        • Unity of Command
        • Scalar Chain
      • Decision-Making
        • Characteristics of Decision-Making
        • Principles of Decision-Making
        • Guidelines of Decision-Making
        • Individual vs Group Decision-Making
        • Police Decision-Making
    • CrDI 103 Specialized Crime Investigation 2
      • Crimes Against Property
      • Review on Evidence
      • Investigating Crimes Against Property
      • Interview and Interrogation
    • CrDI 105 Technical English 1
      • Review on English Grammar
      • Written Office Communications
      • Correspondence Etiquette
      • Law Enforcement Agencies Correspondence
      • Radio Codes and Phonetics Used in Police Reports
      • Police Reports
    • Crim 106c Dispute Resolution and Crises/Incidents Management
      • Fundamentals of Dispute Resolution
      • CAM and JDR
      • Litigation
      • Barangay Justice System
      • Retributive Justice vs Restorative Justice
      • Critical Incident Management
      • Disaster Management Protocols
      • Additional Notes
    • FrSc 105 Lie Detection Techniques
      • Introduction to Lie Detection
        • Psychology of Lying
        • Lies and Liars
        • Ancient Methods of Detecting Deception
        • Other Methods
      • Fundamentals of Polygraphy
        • Definition of Relevant Terms
        • The Nervous System
        • Theory Behind the Polygraph
        • The Polygraph Instrument
        • General Uses
      • Reliability and Validity
        • Scientific Validity
        • Legal Aspects of Polygraph Use
        • Pros and Cons
      • Question Formulation for Polygraph Examination
      • Conduct of Polygraph Examination
    • FrSc 106 Forensic Ballistics
      • Overview of Forensic Ballistics
        • History of Forensic Ballistics
        • Relevant Personalities
        • Branches of Ballistics
      • Firearms
        • Characteristics of Firearms
        • Classifications of Firearms
        • Firearm Markings
      • Ammunition
      • The Forensic Ballistics Laboratory
      • Court Presentation
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Crim Notes
  • FrSc 106 Forensic Ballistics
  • Overview of Forensic Ballistics
  • History of Forensic Ballistics

History of Forensic Ballistics

The history of forensic ballistics begins in the 1493 – 1508 period when Harold Peterson, in a book, discusses firearm riflings with Emperor Maximillian of Germany. This is the earliest known reference to any manner of analysis when it comes to firearms. The value of rifling was not recognized until the late 19th century.

Around 1835 – 1899, certain techniques were developed, including simple observation, physical matching, caliber determination from an examination of the shape and size of a projectile, and experimentation, that would ultimately be associated with the field of forensic ballistics.

During 1900 – 1930, the science gained recognition from several judicial systems around the world due to particular events where it become most helpful.

In 1929, the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre occurred. This was an incident related to gangster violence and happened in Chicago in the USA. The investigations done in the aftermath of the event bolstered the reputation of firearm identification techniques.

During the 1930 – 1970 period, more events occurred that moved forensic ballistics forward.

In the United States, the Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory (SCDL) began operations at Northwestern University in late 1929 or early 1930.

In 1932, the Federal Bureau of Identification Laboratory was formed. Similar laboratories were also created all over the world as the science continued to evolve during the period.

Meanwhile, the Bureau of Forensic Ballistics was established by Charles E. Waite, Maj. (later Col.) Calvin H. Goddard, Phillip O. Gravelle, and John H. Fisler in New York, New York in 1935.

Then, the Association of Firearm and Toolmark Examiners (AFTE) was organized in Chicago, IL in February 1969.

During 1970 – 1999, The evolution of forensic ballistics continued along with significant growth in the number of scientists being employed in the field. New tools coming from various technological advancements of the era, including computers and the binocular comparison microscope, markedly contributed to the evolutionary changes happening in the field.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2025 Joan Advincula.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown